Search results

  1. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    That reflects what I see from my side. Right. I've got a party to go to. An unfortunately civilised one at that. If I carry on sitting here playing with testnet and drinking beer I'll make a tit of myself. Have fun drk buddies. Thanks for your help today. .
  2. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Thanks moli
  3. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Status: 0/unconfirmed, has not been successfully broadcast yetDate: 29/11/2014 16:14To: mpR6rMZtbF9Fuiw8CahPmerjZ5iqPpGrmnDebit: -5.00 DRKTransaction fee: -0.10000006 DRKNet amount: -5.10000006 DRKTransaction ID: 743c00b99bde039799af2453ec917c52bd73da4c39c3ad0f5759f319f105b895
  4. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Can somebody give me a quick explanation of instantxdepth? Or point me to the post that explains it...
  5. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    I dont mean to ask the obvious but are you ticking the InstantX box?
  6. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Just be mindful that block rate is high There does appear to be a relationship although I don't understand enough to prove it either way.
  7. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    There is a distinct PoW feel to some of these transactions... Any thoughts devs?
  8. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Sorry, was log file sifting. I received at 1538GMT and can see 4 confirmations: Status: 4/unconfirmed
  9. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Taking me a while to find it. Is the debug.log heavily truncated nowdays? Only seems to go back half an hour or so for me. Some of my earlier crashes show up in windows event viewer but I don't have enough debug.log to see the corresponding log line. The most recent one (posted above) isn't...
  10. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    I've had the same but as Yidakee says, it always seems to send in the end.
  11. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    I've also had a few of these while I've not even been using the QT
  12. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

  13. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Yidakee. The 10DRK that I sent you using a normal transaction seems to have confirmed faster than the one I sent using DS. Is that what you are seeing in your transaction list?
  14. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    I've got a test plan template that I wrote for one of my clients recently. I think it might be useful to try to map out a proper test plan in addition to our adhoc and ping pong testing. I'll see if I have time to make a start on it this afternoon.
  15. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Thank you kindly. My first ever tip! tDRK or otherwise :grin:
  16. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    I guess we are going to have to test this in a more scientific way. I'll go get a case of beer to help.
  17. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    14:51:19 Def not darksent this time! Status: 0/unconfirmed, has not been successfully broadcast yetDate: 29/11/2014 14:50To: Yidakee ITX mnxWCg8AYtuV5CbQs2LpUnwF6u73Hu9NN4Debit: -10.00 DRKNet amount: -10.00 DRKTransaction ID: f0d7dc41bcd719499ce9c2ca781da02bbf98109cdfadc242a401aa53f6871b99
  18. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Scratch that! That was accidentally darksent!
  19. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Lets try again then. Def not darksend 14:47:18 Status: 0/unconfirmed, has not been successfully broadcast yetDate: 29/11/2014 14:47To: Yidakee ITX mnxWCg8AYtuV5CbQs2LpUnwF6u73Hu9NN4Debit: -10.00 DRKTransaction fee: -0.10000011 DRKNet amount: -10.10000011 DRKTransaction ID...
  20. stonehedge

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Cheers. Starting to see some mining payments.
Back
Top